Page 10 of 12

Re: Smack Talk

PostPosted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 12:11 pm
by David Yun
Oouf Paul, you're sonnin' Mike. Patting him on the head is some lowdown smack ;) The whole Wudan division is nuts. I'd be 0-3 too.

RAWR I'M COMING FOR YOU CLOWN CAR GONNA GIVE YOU YOUR FIRST LOSS SHAOLIN STYLE REPRESENT

Re: Smack Talk

PostPosted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 10:07 pm
by Zeke
Since you dropped Torrey Smith from your roster I have faith he's gonna win me the game. :mrgreen:

Re: Smack Talk

PostPosted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 5:21 am
by Mike
I take solace in the fact that the smack talked on this board is more disappointing than my inevitable high scoring, 0-16 season will be.

Re: Smack Talk

PostPosted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 11:52 am
by David Yun
I be shit talkin' your shit talkin' Mike and you have yet to respond! Just to refresh your memory:

"Says the guy with no legitimate RB3 to cover bye weeks and injuries. And drafted two TEs with two consecutive upper-mid picks."

"@Mike - Your material is less effective in the written word. It needs that intonated sneer to pack the necessary punch to cover the fact that you're just sound and fury (signifying nothing)."

"dumpster dumpster dumpster

your all dick dueling for runner up, because ill be champion with a TE @ flex!

dumpster dump dumpster"


PLUS, you just resorted to Vargas Fu "Son of Shit" style. You're better than that.

Re: Smack Talk

PostPosted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:12 am
by trebuchet
It's late, early day tomorrow, so here we go:

@Kang: Hey, Cheesehead! I'm gonna win blah blah blah you're gonna lose blah blah blah therefore the only logical resolution to this apparent quandary is that the Queen of England must be a man.

Good night. See you on Sunday.

Re: Smack Talk

PostPosted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 7:27 am
by David Yun
Dang Paul, you just gave Mike's point some credence.

Re: Smack Talk

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 6:50 am
by trebuchet
Nope.

I talked with him in person and it seems to me that if he wants better smack talk on the forums then he needs to step up HIS game as well.

Had a long ass retort but I erased it because it was referencing a private conversation. All I'm going to say is this:

@Mike: there's only one rule in smack -- give as good as you get. If you feel that the level of smack talk is low THEN ELEVATE THAT SHIT, MOTHERFUCKER! No more whining about smack talk, just fucking DO IT! :x

Re: Smack Talk

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 1:09 pm
by David Yun
Agreed. You just missed my point that this:

trebuchet wrote:I'm gonna win blah blah blah you're gonna lose blah blah blah therefore the only logical resolution to this apparent quandary is that the Queen of England must be a man.


...was terrible smack. I can't even say it's weak, as I'd have to understand it first.

Re: Smack Talk

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 1:22 pm
by David Yun
It'd help if Mike actually DID anything to warrant smack. It's like he's scared like a puppy in a thunderstorm about adding anyone from waivers, or making trades. I guess he can crow about wins, but it's tough to get them if you don't have even a SINGLE TRANSACTION on the year to improve your team's deficiencies.

Re: Smack Talk

PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:52 am
by Mike
We're playing Ironman Ball up in this bitch. Your paltry trades and waivers show a lack of stones (except for Dee, who is running 4 sack dumplings to everybody elses' 2).